What is Affirmative Action in College Admissions and Its Impact?
Diversity and merit are two words that dominate the conversation around college admissions. But what happens when these seemingly opposing forces collide? That’s the crux of the affirmative action debate. This policy, aimed at fostering a more inclusive campus environment, has been an ongoing controversy.
Is it a crucial step towards a level playing field, or does it unfairly tip the scales? Does it enrich the educational experience, or does it come at the cost of academic excellence?
In this blog post, we’ll have a look at the arguments on both sides, analyze the recent Supreme Court ruling, and explore what the future holds for affirmative action in college admissions.
What is Affirmative Action in College Admissions?
Affirmative action in college admissions is a policy designed to increase the diversity of the student body by considering an applicant’s racial or ethnic background alongside other factors like grades and test scores. It arose from the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s under the Johnson administration to address a history of discrimination that excluded students of color from higher education.
The core idea behind affirmative action is that a student’s background can influence their academic achievements. Students from underrepresented minorities may have attended schools with fewer resources, had limited access to advanced coursework, or faced social and economic challenges that impacted their grades or test scores. Affirmative action allows colleges to consider these factors and ensure that talented students from all backgrounds have a fair shot at admission.
Equality of Opportunity vs. Equality of Outcome
The goal was to create a positive incentive for businesses and colleges to diversify their applicant pools. Affirmative action policies did this by granting limited preference to qualified candidates from underrepresented groups. This aimed to create a more diverse environment in workplaces and educational institutions, ultimately leading to a decrease in discriminatory practices.
However, affirmative action presents a complex paradox. It seeks to achieve equality of opportunity and level the playing field for historically disadvantaged groups. Yet, in doing so, it treats these groups differently in the admissions or hiring process. This difference can be seen as a contradiction to the ideal of complete equality.
As pointed out in a New Yorker article titled “The Changing Meaning of Affirmative Action,” legal efforts aimed at achieving racial equality ironically created a situation where race couldn’t be considered for policies designed to benefit these very groups. The article highlights the tension: we removed race from the equation to prevent discrimination but to achieve true equality of outcome, we might need to consider it again in a nuanced way.
Read also: How Many Colleges Should You Apply To?
What is the Legal History of Affirmative Action in College Admissions?
- 1978: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: This case established that affirmative action programs could consider race as a factor in admissions decisions, but quotas based solely on race were not allowed.
- 1995: University of California ends Affirmative Action: The Regents of the University of California voted to eliminate all affirmative action programs based on race, gender, ethnicity, and national origin.
- 1996-1997: Texas v. Hopwood and the Top 10% Plan: The Court of Appeals ruled against race-conscious admissions at the University of Texas. In response, Texas created the Top 10% Plan, guaranteeing admission to any in-state student in the top 10% of their graduating class.
- 2003: Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger:
- Grutter: The Supreme Court upheld race-conscious admissions at the University of Michigan Law School but expressed hope that affirmative action would no longer be necessary for 25 years.
- Gratz: The Court struck down the point-based system at the University of Michigan because it essentially created quotas for underrepresented minorities.
- 2016: Fisher v. University of Texas: The Supreme Court upheld the University of Texas’ race-conscious admissions program.
- 2014: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action: The Supreme Court upheld a Michigan amendment banning affirmative action in public universities.
- 2019: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard: A federal court ruled in favor of Harvard, finding no evidence of intentional discrimination against Asian Americans in their admissions process.
- 2022 and 2023: Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and UNC-Chapel Hill: The Supreme Court ruled that the use of race in college admissions was unconstitutional. The court’s opinion, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, argued that admissions decisions should be based on individual merit, not race.
Read also: What is a College Likely Letters and How to Get One?
Impact of Ending Affirmative Action on College Admissions
The end of affirmative action in college admissions could significantly impact students of color, particularly in three key areas:
Reduced acceptance rates
Previously, colleges could consider race alongside other factors, helping to counteract historic achievement gaps that disadvantaged some minority applicants. Without this flexibility, some students of color may see their acceptance chances decrease, especially at highly selective institutions.
Limited outreach
Colleges may shy away from directly targeting students of color for recruitment to avoid legal challenges. This, combined with the shift to digital applications by the College Board, could lead to a decline in overall communication between colleges and many students, potentially disproportionately impacting students of color who may have relied more heavily on targeted outreach programs.
Increased undermatching
The most selective private colleges often offer the most generous financial aid packages. If these institutions experience a drop in enrollment from underrepresented minorities, some qualified students who might have been accepted previously may be forced to choose less selective schools with less robust financial aid options. This phenomenon, known as “undermatching,” could leave talented students with a financial burden at institutions that may not offer the same academic or professional opportunities.
Read also: Why This College Essay
Advantages of Affirmative Action in College Admissions
Diversity
Affirmative action has fostered rich and diverse college campuses. Students are exposed to a wider range of cultures, ideas, and ways of thinking, enriching their educational experience and preparing them for a more globalized world.
Leveling the playing field
Legacy admissions, where children of alumni receive preferential treatment, are prevalent at many top universities. Affirmative action helps counter this advantage by creating a fairer playing field for traditionally underrepresented applicants. It also recognizes the potential disadvantages these groups may have faced, such as limited resources or lower-quality schools, which could impact grades and test scores.
Increases economic mobility
Earning a college degree is a proven pathway to economic advancement. Studies show that individuals from low-income backgrounds who obtain a four-year degree are significantly less likely to remain in poverty. By increasing access to education for underrepresented minorities, affirmative action empowers them to improve their economic prospects and achieve career goals they might not have otherwise considered.
Dispels stereotypes
Exposure to diverse peers can challenge preconceived notions about race and ethnicity. In classrooms and on campus, students have the opportunity to interact with classmates from different backgrounds, fostering understanding and dismantling stereotypes.
Accounts for societal loss
Historical disadvantages due to systemic inequalities have limited wealth-building opportunities for many minority groups. Affirmative action helps address this societal loss by providing access to education, a key factor in upward mobility. This allows these groups to participate more fully in the economic and social fabric of the nation.
Read also: How to Use the Common App Additional Information Section With Examples
Disadvantages of Affirmative Action in College Admissions
The paradox of merit
One criticism is that affirmative action can lead to reverse discrimination. While aiming to level the playing field, it might disadvantage some qualified individuals from majority groups.
Socioeconomic blind spot
Another critique highlights that affirmative action often focuses on race without considering socioeconomic background. Studies like Richard Kahlenberg at the Century Foundation show that a significant portion of minority students admitted through affirmative action come from wealthy families. This raises concerns about whether the policy effectively targets those most disadvantaged.
Does it diminish achievements?
A further concern is the potential for affirmative action to undermine the accomplishments of beneficiaries. If someone attends a prestigious school where affirmative action is practiced, others might question the legitimacy of their achievements.
Stereotypes and the need for true diversity
Additionally, critics argue that affirmative action might reinforce stereotypes about underrepresented groups needing constant assistance. True diversity goes beyond mere numbers. A Black student from a privileged background might have less in common with a Black student from a low-income family than with their majority-group peers.
This raises questions about the effectiveness of affirmative action in creating a truly inclusive environment, particularly when economic disparities within minority groups persist, as evidenced by the low percentage of students from low-income backgrounds at elite institutions.
Read also: First Generation College Student
From the Desk of Yocket
Supporters point to the importance of diversity on campus. A mix of students from different backgrounds creates a richer learning environment where everyone is exposed to new ideas and perspectives. This not only benefits students but also prepares them for the increasingly multicultural world they’ll enter after graduation. Additionally, Affirmative Action can be seen as a way to address systemic inequalities in education. Students of color may attend underfunded schools with limited resources and lack access to advanced coursework. Affirmative Action allows colleges to consider these challenges and ensure all students are evaluated fairly.
Opponents argue that Affirmative Action amounts to reverse discrimination. They believe that qualified students from non-minority groups are being unfairly passed over for applicants of color with lower academic achievement. They advocate for a system based solely on merit, where admissions decisions are based on test scores and grades. This ensures that the most academically prepared students are admitted, regardless of race.
The recent Supreme Court decision has put the future of Affirmative Action into uncertainty. While it restricted how colleges consider race, it didn’t eliminate the practice entirely. Platforms like Yocket can provide updates and insights into how this decision may impact college admissions processes. The search for a solution that balances fairness, merit, and diversity will likely continue. Perhaps colleges can find alternative ways to consider socioeconomic background or develop programs to improve educational opportunities for all students before they reach the application stage.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is affirmative action in college admissions?
Affirmative action refers to policies designed to create equal opportunity in education and employment for historically disadvantaged groups. In college admissions, this means universities can consider race as one factor among many to achieve a diverse student body.
Is affirmative action still legal in college admissions?
As of June 2023, the Supreme Court had decided a case that effectively prohibited the use of race in admissions decisions at most public universities. However, the decision allows private colleges to continue considering race as a factor.
The impact of this ruling is still being debated, but it’s important to be aware of the current situation.
How did Affirmative Action work before the Supreme Court decision?
Before June 2023, colleges could consider race as one of many factors in admissions decisions. They couldn’t use quotas or solely rely on race and had to show they explored race-neutral alternatives.
What are the arguments for Affirmative Action in college admissions?
Proponents argue that a diverse student body benefits everyone by fostering a richer learning environment and preparing graduates for a multicultural world. Systemic inequalities can disadvantage students of color (unequal funding, limited access to AP classes). Affirmative action aims to address these issues.